busbey commented on a change in pull request #51:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hbase-thirdparty/pull/51#discussion_r629373182



##########
File path: hbase-shaded-jackson-jaxrs-json-provider/pom.xml
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0"; 
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; 
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 
http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd";>
+    <!--
+  /**
+   * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+   * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+   * distributed with this work for additional information
+   * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+   * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+   * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+   * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+   *
+   *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+   *
+   * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+   * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+   * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+   * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+   * limitations under the License.
+   */
+
+
+    ON MVN COMPILE NOT WORKING
+
+    If you wondering why 'mvn compile' does not work building HBase
+    (in particular, if you are doing it for the first time), instead do
+    'mvn package'.  If you are interested in the full story, see
+    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6795.
+
+  -->
+    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
+    <parent>
+        <groupId>org.apache.hbase.thirdparty</groupId>
+        <artifactId>hbase-thirdparty</artifactId>
+        <version>3.5.1-SNAPSHOT</version>

Review comment:
       Normally when adding in a new artifact we'd want to bump the version 
number across the project to the next minor release. But I think there's 
already a need to bump to the next major version due to the jersey package 
rename? Is that correct?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to