[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17361867#comment-17361867
]
Bharath Vissapragada commented on HBASE-25998:
----------------------------------------------
[~zhangduo] [~apurtell] [~stack] might of interest to you (draft patch up for
review), results seem too good to be true. If you don't mind trying the patch
locally in your environment (just want to eliminate any noise from my end)..
PTAL.
> Revisit synchronization in SyncFuture
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-25998
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25998
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Performance, regionserver, wal
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1, 1.7.0, 2.5.0
> Reporter: Bharath Vissapragada
> Assignee: Bharath Vissapragada
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: monitor-overhead-1.png, monitor-overhead-2.png
>
>
> While working on HBASE-25984, I noticed some weird frames in the flame graphs
> around monitor entry exit consuming a lot of CPU cycles (see attached
> images). Noticed that the synchronization there is too coarse grained and
> sometimes unnecessary. I did a simple patch that switched to a reentrant lock
> based synchronization with condition variable rather than a busy wait and
> that showed 70-80% increased throughput in WAL PE. Seems too good to be
> true.. (more details in the comments).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
