[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17376174#comment-17376174
 ] 

Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-24984:
----------------------------------------

We could write a UT to have a 100% fail case when using SimpleRPCServer (where 
we have control over the pooled DBBs) and FSWal.  With this its clear what is 
going wrong.  We also met with this problem with one of our customer.

> WAL corruption due to early DBBs re-use when Durability.ASYNC_WAL is used 
> with multi operation
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-24984
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-24984
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rpc, wal
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.6
>            Reporter: Liu Junhong
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 2.5.0, 2.3.6, 3.0.0-alpha-2, 2.4.5
>
>
> After bugfix HBASE-22539, When client use BufferedMutator or multiple 
> mutation , there will be one RpcCall and mutliple FSWALEntry .  At the time 
> RpcCall finish and one FSWALEntry call release() , the remain FSWALEntries 
> may trigger RuntimeException or segmentation fault .
> We should use RefCnt  instead of AtomicInteger for 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.ServerCall.reference?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to