[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17422134#comment-17422134
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-26251:
--------------------------------
Results for branch master
[build #400 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/400/]:
(/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/400/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/400/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/400/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> StochasticLoadBalancer metrics should update even if balancer doesn't run
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-26251
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26251
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Balancer
> Reporter: Bryan Beaudreault
> Assignee: Zhuoyue Huang
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.5.0, 3.0.0-alpha-2
>
>
> Currently we only update StochasticLoadBalancerMetrics at the very end of a
> balancer run, once a plan has been found. In fact, we update the metrics
> based on that plan even if we don't end up executing the plan, which seems
> incorrect.
> Regardless of whether the balancer decides to run or not, cluster costs are
> changing all the time. Since we don't update these metrics any other time,
> operators miss out on important information about the balance of their
> cluster over time.
> I briefly looked into it and it would be relatively trivial to add another
> call to updateStochasticCosts at the beginning of the balanceTable method,
> before we determine if the cluster is in need of balancing. This would be an
> improvement but would still miss cases where the balancer is disabled or
> unable to run due to regions in transition, etc.
> It would be good if we could make it so updateStochasticCosts get called
> periodically regardless of whether the balancer is enabled or can run.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
