[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17434374#comment-17434374
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-26327:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
        [build #423 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/423/]:
 (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/423/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]






(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/423/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/HBase/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/423/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Replicas cohosted on a rack shouldn't keep triggering Balancer
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-26327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26327
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Balancer
>            Reporter: Clara Xiong
>            Assignee: Clara Xiong
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, Balancer has a shortcut check for cohosted replicas of the same 
> region/host/rack and will keep triggering balancer if it is non-zero.
> With the trending of kube and cloud solution for HBase, operators don't have 
> full control of the topology or are not even aware of the topology. There are 
> cases that it is not possible to satisfy or requires sacrificing other 
> constraints such as region count balancing on RS. We want to keep there per 
> RS/host check for availability of regions, especially for meta region. We 
> haven't heard problem with rack so far. The cost functions will still be 
> considered during balancing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to