[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17503791#comment-17503791
]
Andrew Kyle Purtell commented on HBASE-26817:
---------------------------------------------
I share [~busbey]'s opinion. Parent classes should not be less permissive than
subclasses. In the reverse direction, it's valid to have private
implementations of public or LP interfaces.
> Mark RpcExecutor as IA.LimitedPrivate COPROC and PHOENIX
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-26817
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26817
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: compatibility
> Affects Versions: 2.5.0, 3.0.0-alpha-2, 2.6.0, 2.4.10
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Priority: Major
>
> {{RpcExecutor}}, an abstract base class, is marked as {{IA.Private}}.
> However, it has several subclasses that are marked as
> {{IA.LimitedPrivate(COPROC, PHOENIX)}}. I think that the base class needs to
> match the highest exposure level of any of its subclasses.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
