[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17512899#comment-17512899
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-26248:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2.5
[build #78 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(x) {color:red}-1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(x) {color:red}-1 client integration test{color}
-- Something went wrong with this stage, [check relevant console
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/78//console].
> Should find a suitable way to let users specify the store file tracker
> implementation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-26248
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26248
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: HFile
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> Now all the implementations are marked as IA.Private, so there is no safe way
> for users to specify them.
> But for simplify, maybe we should not expose the full class name of the
> implementation classes to users. Just follow the way in WALFactory, to
> introduce an alias name for the implemention, for example
> DEFAULT, FILE, REGION, etc.
> Thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
