[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400559#comment-13400559
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-5699:
--------------------------------------

Assuming Datanodes and RegionServers are colocated no more bits will have to 
cross the (aggregate) "wires". Further assuming good load balancing within 
HBase the net bandwidth is still spread over the cluster (but with lower 
latency at each RegionServer).
So I do not believe that HBASE-6116 will actually hurt performance.

The key question is whether WAL writing is mostly bound by latency or bandwidth 
(And I do not know.)
Do we get 35-40mb throughput from writing the WAL? If not, it is likely bound 
by latency.
                
> Run with > 1 WAL in HRegionServer
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-5699
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5699
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: binlijin
>            Assignee: Li Pi
>         Attachments: PerfHbase.txt
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to