[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403576#comment-13403576
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-6261:
--------------------------------------
If it only lands in hadoop are we going to be able to use it at all?
Reflection doesn't seem like it's really viable here where we're trying to call
the same method on lots of different Histogram objects; it would be pretty slow
on top of the perf hit we would be taking for the added accuracy.
Can it just replace MetricsHistogram ?
> Better approximate high-percentile percentile latency metrics
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6261
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6261
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Andrew Wang
> Labels: metrics
> Attachments: Latencyestimation.pdf
>
>
> The existing reservoir-sampling based latency metrics in HBase are not
> well-suited for providing accurate estimates of high-percentile (e.g. 90th,
> 95th, or 99th) latency. This is a well-studied problem in the literature (see
> [1] and [2]), the question is determining which methods best suit our needs
> and then implementing it.
> Ideally, we should be able to estimate these high percentiles with minimal
> memory and CPU usage as well as minimal error (e.g. 1% error on 90th, or .1%
> on 99th). It's also desirable to provide this over different time-based
> sliding windows, e.g. last 1 min, 5 mins, 15 mins, and 1 hour.
> I'll note that this would also be useful in HDFS, or really anywhere latency
> metrics are kept.
> [1] http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~muthu/bquant.pdf
> [2] http://infolab.stanford.edu/~manku/papers/04pods-sliding.pdf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
