[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17736785#comment-17736785
]
Bryan Beaudreault commented on HBASE-27947:
-------------------------------------------
I'm wondering if the reason the OOM's appear to come from receiving is just
because we get to a point where we're saturating the pool with writes. As you
said, it's async so we could theoretically keep receiving requests but we can't
receive anymore because there is no room left in the pool for receiving so we
oom.
I took a heap dump when nettyDirectMemory was well over 2gb. In this case there
are 150k PooledUnsafeDirectByteBufs, and they are almost all related to
ChannelOutboundBuffer.
> RegionServer OOM under load when TLS is enabled
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-27947
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27947
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rpc
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Bryan Beaudreault
> Priority: Critical
>
> We are rolling out the server side TLS settings to all of our QA clusters.
> This has mostly gone fine, except on 1 cluster. Most clusters, including this
> one have a sampled {{nettyDirectMemory}} usage of about 30-100mb. This
> cluster tends to get bursts of traffic, in which case it would typically jump
> to 400-500mb. Again this is sampled, so it could have been higher than that.
> When we enabled SSL on this cluster, we started seeing bursts up to at least
> 4gb. This exceeded our {{{}-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize{}}}, which caused OOM's
> and general chaos on the cluster.
>
> We've gotten it under control a little bit by setting
> {{-Dorg.apache.hbase.thirdparty.io.netty.maxDirectMemory}} and
> {{{}-Dorg.apache.hbase.thirdparty.io.netty.tryReflectionSetAccessible{}}}.
> We've set netty's maxDirectMemory to be approx equal to
> ({{{}-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize - BucketCacheSize - ReservoirSize{}}}). Now we
> are seeing netty's own OutOfDirectMemoryError, which is still causing pain
> for clients but at least insulates the other components of the regionserver.
>
> We're still digging into exactly why this is happening. The cluster clearly
> has a bad access pattern, but it doesn't seem like SSL should increase the
> memory footprint by 5-10x like we're seeing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
