[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13411188#comment-13411188
 ] 

Zhihong Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6369:
---------------------------------------

{code}
  public <T extends CoprocessorProtocol, R> Map<byte[],R> coprocessorExec(
      Class<T> protocol, byte[] startKey, byte[] endKey,
      Batch.Call<T,R> callable)
      throws IOException, Throwable {
{code}
Should we protect against table.coprocessorExec() throwing exception ?
Meaning, we should enclose all table.close() calls in finally block.
                
> HTable is not close in AggregationClient
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6369
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6369
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.92.1, 0.94.0
>            Reporter: binlijin
>             Fix For: 0.92.2, 0.96.0, 0.94.2
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6369-0.92.patch, HBASE-6369-0.94.patch, 
> HBASE-6369-trunk.patch
>
>
> In AggregationClient, new a HTable but not close it.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to