[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17738849#comment-17738849
]
Bryan Beaudreault commented on HBASE-27947:
-------------------------------------------
Sorry for all the updates, but I’ve had some success today with the
non-blocking idea in my last comment. I did the simple thing and had handlers
drop calls off the channel is not writable when they pull from the queue. I set
the netty high watermark to 5mb and low watermark to 512kb. This still resolved
the OOMs but handler usage is better. I’m going to do more testing tomorrow
before I package it up for a PR
> RegionServer OOM under load when TLS is enabled
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-27947
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-27947
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rpc
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0
> Reporter: Bryan Beaudreault
> Priority: Critical
>
> We are rolling out the server side TLS settings to all of our QA clusters.
> This has mostly gone fine, except on 1 cluster. Most clusters, including this
> one have a sampled {{nettyDirectMemory}} usage of about 30-100mb. This
> cluster tends to get bursts of traffic, in which case it would typically jump
> to 400-500mb. Again this is sampled, so it could have been higher than that.
> When we enabled SSL on this cluster, we started seeing bursts up to at least
> 4gb. This exceeded our {{{}-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize{}}}, which caused OOM's
> and general chaos on the cluster.
>
> We've gotten it under control a little bit by setting
> {{-Dorg.apache.hbase.thirdparty.io.netty.maxDirectMemory}} and
> {{{}-Dorg.apache.hbase.thirdparty.io.netty.tryReflectionSetAccessible{}}}.
> We've set netty's maxDirectMemory to be approx equal to
> ({{{}-XX:MaxDirectMemorySize - BucketCacheSize - ReservoirSize{}}}). Now we
> are seeing netty's own OutOfDirectMemoryError, which is still causing pain
> for clients but at least insulates the other components of the regionserver.
>
> We're still digging into exactly why this is happening. The cluster clearly
> has a bad access pattern, but it doesn't seem like SSL should increase the
> memory footprint by 5-10x like we're seeing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
