[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780079#comment-17780079
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28157:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
        [build #932 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/932/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/932/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/932/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/932/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> hbck should report previously reported regions with null region location
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28157
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.6
>            Reporter: Andrew Kyle Purtell
>            Assignee: Andrew Kyle Purtell
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.6.0, 2.4.18, 3.0.0, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.5.7
>
>
> Operators bypassed some in progress TRSPs leading to a state where some 
> regions were persistently in transition but hidden. 
> Because the master builds its list of regions in transition by tracking TRSP, 
> the bypass of TRSP removed the regions from the RIT list. This was expected, 
> but I will propose a change to RIT tracking on another issue. 
> The online hbck chore also did not report the inconsistency. This was not 
> expected.
> HBASE-28144 was another issue related to this incident, already fixed. 
> Ensure that hbck will report as inconsistent regions where previously a 
> location was reported but now the region location is null, if it is not 
> expected to be offline.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to