[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17822180#comment-17822180
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28321:
--------------------------------

Results for branch master
        [build #1023 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1023/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1023/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1023/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/master/1023/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> RpcConnectionRegistry is broken when security is enabled and we use different 
> principal for master and region server
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28321
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28321
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Client, IPC/RPC, security
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> After introducing RpcConnectionRegistry, we let master and region server both 
> implement ClientMetaService.
> In our current client architecture, when security is enabled, we rely on the 
> record in SecurityInfo to determine the server principal to use, 
> unfortunately there is only one principal can be specified, so if we use 
> different principal for master and region server, either we can not connect 
> to master, or we can not connect to region server.
> And just changing the server principal field in SecurityInfo to an array can 
> not solve the problem, as when connecting, we do not know whether the remote 
> server is a master or region server, so we still can not determine which 
> principal to use...
> Anyway, since this has been in our code base since 2.5.0, it is not a new 
> problem, so just set it as critical, not a blocker. But we should find out 
> the solution ASAP.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to