[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17835059#comment-17835059
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-28457:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-3
[build #181 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/181/]:
(/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/181/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/181/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/181/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}
> Introduce a version field in file based tracker record
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28457
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: HFile
> Reporter: Duo Zhang
> Assignee: Duo Zhang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.6.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.5.9
>
>
> Per the discussion around HBASE-27826 and the related design doc, we all
> agree that we should add version field to store file tracker, so when
> downgrading, we will know that we will miss something when reading a tracker
> file with higher version and fail the initialization, instead of ignore it
> silently and may cause data loss.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
