[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423272#comment-13423272
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5954:
---------------------------------------
bq. a flag per Put/Delete/Increment/Append/etc, would be best option
Makes sense, since both you and Todd got here after giving it consideration.
bq. On the other hand I do not want to have completely diverging
implementations for this for 0.94 and 0.96
I think we have to take this pain, a reflection based strategy in 0.94 and a
module based strategy in 0.96. I this case I'd judge it worth it. But that's
going to be a high bar for other things.
> Allow proper fsync support for HBase
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5954
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5954
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2
>
> Attachments: 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk-v2.txt,
> 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk-v3.txt, 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk-v4.txt,
> 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk-v5.txt, 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk-v6.txt,
> 5954-trunk-hdfs-trunk.txt, hbase-hdfs-744.txt
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
