[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17856925#comment-17856925
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28656:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-3
        [build #233 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/233/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/233/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]




(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- Something went wrong running this stage, please [check relevant console 
output|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/233//console].


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/233/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Optimize the verifyCopyResult logic in ExportSnapshot
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28656
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Liangjun He
>            Assignee: Liangjun He
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> In [HBASE-28625|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28625], we added 
> checksum logic comparison for ExportSnapshot files, but the checksum 
> verification scenarios were too simple. This issue aims to address the 
> existing problem. For detailed discussion, please refer to PR 
> [5950|https://github.com/apache/hbase/pull/5950].



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to