[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13424667#comment-13424667
]
Zhihong Ted Yu commented on HBASE-6427:
---------------------------------------
I understand the goal for this JIRA and am in support of it.
bq. the downstream must do some complicated logic to merge with the previous
scanner in ways that we cannot anticipate.
This illustrates the intricacies of scanner chaining. If a scanner is designed
for some specific purpose, I wouldn't expect it to function correctly when an
arbitrary number of scanners are chained (both) upstream and downstream.
In fact, chaining introduces unnecessary burden on individual scanner.
> Pluggable compaction policies via coprocessors
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6427
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6427
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
> Assignee: Lars Hofhansl
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 6427-notReady.txt, 6427-v1.txt, 6427-v2.txt,
> 6427-v3.txt, 6427-v4.txt, 6427-v5.txt, 6427-v7.txt
>
>
> When implementing higher level stores on top of HBase it is necessary to
> allow dynamic control over how long KVs must be kept around.
> Semi-static config options for ColumnFamilies (# of version or TTL) is not
> sufficient.
> This can be done with a few additional coprocessor hooks, or by makeing
> Store.ScanInfo pluggable.
> Was:
> The simplest way to achieve this is to have a pluggable class to determine
> the smallestReadpoint for Region. That way outside code can control what KVs
> to retain.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
