[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17866826#comment-17866826
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-28683:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.5
        [build #569 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/]:
 (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.5/569/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test{color}


> Only allow one TableProcedureInterface for a single table to run at the same 
> time for some special procedure types
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-28683
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28683
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: master, proc-v2
>            Reporter: Duo Zhang
>            Assignee: Duo Zhang
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.6.1, 2.5.10
>
>
> We have a table lock in the MasterProcedureScheduler, which is designed to 
> only allow one procedure to run at the same time when they require exclusive 
> lock.
> But there is a problem that for availability, usually we can not always hold 
> the exclusive lock through the whole procedure life time, as if so, we can 
> not execute region assignment for this table too. The solution is to set 
> holdLock to false, which means we will release the table lock after one 
> execution cycle.
> In this way, it is possible that different table procedures may execute at 
> the same time, which could mess things up.
> Especially that, in HBASE-28522, we find out that it is even impossible for 
> DisableTableProcedure to hold the exclusive lock all the time. If the steps 
> for DisableTableProcedure can be overlapped with other procedures like 
> ModifyTableProcedure or even EnableTableProcedure, things will be 
> definationly messed up...
> So we need to find another way to ensure that for a single table, only one of 
> these procedures can be executed at the same time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to