[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17895947#comment-17895947
]
Nihal Jain edited comment on HBASE-28921 at 11/6/24 1:11 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pushed to all active branches! Thank you [~stoty] for reviewing.
was (Author: nihaljain.cs):
Pushed to all active branches!
> Avoid bundling hbase-webapps folder in default jars
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-28921
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-28921
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: security, UI
> Reporter: Nihal Jain
> Assignee: Nihal Jain
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.5.11, 2.6.2
>
>
> We are bundling all webapp resources in hbase-server, hbase-thrift and
> transitively to hbase-shaded-mapreduce jar. This can be an issue as if any of
> the js projects used by hbase are vulnerable, security scan tools like
> sonatype start flagging the jars too as vulnerable since they contain
> vulnerable code.
> With this JIRA, we want to avoid bundling static webapp resources in our jars.
> For example: Bootstrap 3.4.1 which is used by hbase, has multiple medium CVEs
> reported recently. See [https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/bootstrap/3.4.1]
> for details.
> And since we are bundling all webapp resources in hbase-server, hbase-thrift
> and transitively to hbase-shaded-mapreduce jar. And hence sonatype reports
> all such jars also as vulnerable:
> |3|CVE-2024-6484|2.3|bootstrap 3.4.1|
> |3|CVE-2024-6484|2.3|org.apache.hbase : hbase-server : 2.6.0|
> |3|CVE-2024-6484|2.3|org.apache.hbase : hbase-shaded-mapreduce : 2.6.0|
> |3|CVE-2024-6484|2.3|org.apache.hbase : hbase-thrift : 2.6.0|
> It is wise to remove such files from our jars to avoid any bigger hiccups in
> future.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
