[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17936791#comment-17936791
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-29183:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-2.6
        [build #293 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/]:
 (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3) 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop ${HADOOP_THREE_VERSION} backward compatibility 
checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2.6/293/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for HBase 2 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}


> Fix flakeyness on TestVerifyBucketCacheFile
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-29183
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29183
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta-1, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.7.0, 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Assignee: Wellington Chevreuil
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.7.0, 2.6.3
>
>
> I've noticed some flakeyness in some of the tests from 
> TestVerifyBucketCacheFile. One of the latest intermittent failures I've found 
> on the precommit run for a PR:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<17408>
>       at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
>       at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:647)
>       at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:633)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.bucket.TestVerifyBucketCacheFile.testModifiedBucketCacheFileData(TestVerifyBucketCacheFile.java:247)
>  {noformat}
> These are quite hard to reproduce locally, but after analysing the test code 
> and the stack trace, I believe this might be related to the changes fromĀ 
> HBASE-28900, which allowed BucketAllocator to complete initialisation with a 
> partially recovered cache, requiring the backingMap validation to complete, 
> in order to get rid of entries with inconsistent checksums.
> The solution for such tests that deal with persistent cache recover is to put 
> an extra wait for the backingMap validation to be complete, before starting 
> checking on the expected bucket cache size/usage.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to