[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17938046#comment-17938046
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-29203:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-3
[build #397 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.5 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.6 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop 3.4.0 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/397/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}
> There should be a StorefileSize equivalent to the TableSkewCost
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-29203
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29203
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Balancer
> Affects Versions: 2.7.0
> Reporter: Ray Mattingly
> Assignee: Ray Mattingly
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 4.0.0-alpha-1, 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2
>
>
> We don't want to rely on per-table balancing, but we do want tables to be
> balanced effectively based on their data size. This is because regions are
> variably sized, but 1gb is always 1gb, so, in a well distributed schema, data
> size is a better metric for a region's load than just counting every region
> identically.
> Right now the TableSkewCostFunction is the balancer's mechanism for balancing
> each table somewhat independently within a cluster-wide plan, but it only
> looks at region counts. We could balance more effectively if we had a
> StoreFileTableSkewCost.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
