[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17942408#comment-17942408
 ] 

Istvan Toth commented on HBASE-29248:
-------------------------------------

The proper behaviour is adding the prefix for client, but not for the 
in-process ZK quorum. (like it was done originally), I have restored that.

> HBASE-28529 made an incompatible change to hbase.zookeeper.property handling
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-29248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29248
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Zookeeper
>            Reporter: Istvan Toth
>            Assignee: Istvan Toth
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Before HBASE-28529 , HBase took the properties with the 
> _hbase.zookeeper.property._ , removed the _hbase.zookeeper.property._ and 
> added the _zookeeper._ prefix, then set this as a system property.
> When HBASE-28529 has rewritten this to use ZKClientConfig, it forgot to add 
> the _zookeeper._  prefix to the property. ZK uses the exact same names for 
> the ZKClientConfig properties and System properties (where both are supported)
> For example,  to set the _zookeeper.client.secure_ property, earlier we had 
> to set {_}hbase.zookeeper.property.{_}{_}client.secure ,{_} while now we need 
> to set {_}hbase.zookeeper.property.zookeeper.{_}{_}client.secure{_}
> This is an incompatible change, which is likely to cause problems for users 
> that rely on this feature.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to