[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17948407#comment-17948407
]
Hudson commented on HBASE-29252:
--------------------------------
Results for branch branch-2
[build #1265 on
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/]:
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):
(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop2 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop2)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop2_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk8 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk8 (hadoop3)
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK8_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk11 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk11
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK11_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.5 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.6 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.4.0 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-2/1265/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]
(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for HBase 2 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}
> Reduce allocations in RowIndexSeekerV1
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-29252
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29252
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Charles Connell
> Assignee: Charles Connell
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.6.3, 2.5.12
>
> Attachments: scenario-alloc-hs26.html
>
>
> I've looked at a lot of allocation profiles of RegionServers doing a
> read-heavy workload. Some allocations that dominate the chart can be easily
> avoided.
> The following code in the main decode method
> {code:java}
> currentBuffer.asSubByteBuffer(currentBuffer.position(), current.keyLength,
> tmpPair);
> ByteBuffer key = tmpPair.getFirst().duplicate();
> key.position(tmpPair.getSecond()).limit(tmpPair.getSecond() +
> current.keyLength);
> current.keyBuffer = key; {code}
> results in a new ByteBuffer for every cell. The reason to have this duplicate
> ByteBuffer is to hold the result of {{tmpPair.getSecond()}} as its
> {{position}} state. But this in just an integer that can be more cheaply
> stored in a different way. We can introduce a {{current.keyOffset}} variable
> and do this instead:
> {code:java}
> currentBuffer.asSubByteBuffer(currentBuffer.position(), current.keyLength,
> tmpPair);
> current.keyBuffer = tmpPair.getFirst();
> current.keyOffset = tmpPair.getSecond();{code}
> and then reference {{current.keyOffset}} where we previously referenced
> {{{}current.keyBuffer.position(){}}}.
>
> Additionally, {{RowIndexSeekerV1.SeekerState}} contains a
> {{ByteBufferKeyOnlyKeyValue}} field that is replaced on every cell read. This
> object can be reset and re-used instead.
>
> On the attached profile, allocations of the duplicate {{ByteBuffers}} and
> {{{}ByteBufferKeyOnlyKeyValue{}}}s collectively account for 35% of
> allocations profiled. This is probably representative of the behavior of a
> typical RegionServer doing a heavy amount of scans while using RowIndexV1.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
