[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17954826#comment-17954826
 ] 

Hudson commented on HBASE-29222:
--------------------------------

Results for branch branch-3
        [build #421 on 
builds.a.o|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/]: 
(x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}*
----
details (if available):

(/) {color:green}+1 general checks{color}
-- For more information [see general 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/General_20Nightly_20Build_20Report/]








(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop3 checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.5 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 jdk17 hadoop 3.3.6 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(x) {color:red}-1 jdk17 hadoop 3.4.0 backward compatibility checks{color}
-- For more information [see jdk17 
report|https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase%20Nightly/job/branch-3/421/JDK17_20Nightly_20Build_20Report_20_28Hadoop3_29/]


(/) {color:green}+1 source release artifact{color}
-- See build output for details.


(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.5 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.3.6 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.0 {color}
(/) {color:green}+1 client integration test for 3.4.1 {color}


> Avoid expensive tracing calls if tracing is disabled
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-29222
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29222
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: tracing
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-beta-1, 2.5.11, 2.6.2
>            Reporter: Becker Ewing
>            Assignee: Becker Ewing
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 2.7.0, 3.0.0-beta-2, 2.6.3
>
>         Attachments: slow-decompressor-reinit.2.html
>
>
> Building off of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29099—where we 
> removed certain expensive calls if tracing was disabled—it appears that there 
> is more opportunities to avoid allocating/recording trace metadata if we can 
> determine that a trace is disabled. 
> This is inspired by a glance at the first flamegraph in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-29218 where we spent an aggregate 
> 1.48% of all CPU time in OpenTelemetry calls (I filtered for "io/opentelem"). 
> Given that tracing is an opt-in feature, we ideally shouldn't impose a 
> performance penalty if it isn't enabled. Span Calls in the Block I/O Path 
> (particularly those in BlockIOUtils & HFileBlock) look to dominate this 
> flamegraph. We should ensure that we're only recording expensive attributes 
> if tracing is enabled in those paths. 
> As it stands now, BlockIOUtils#readWithExtra spends 40% of it's time in 
> OpenTelemetry calls and the rest of it's time reading data from the 
> filesystem which shows the non-trivial nature of the tracing context being 
> recorded.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to