[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13454503#comment-13454503
]
Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on HBASE-5021:
-------------------------------------------
Since this commit we don't report NoSuchColumnFamilyException on multi() calls,
I opened HBASE-6769.
> Enforce upper bound on timestamp
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-5021
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5021
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg
> Assignee: Nicolas Spiegelberg
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: 5021-addendum.txt,
> ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--D849.1.patch, ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--D849.2.patch,
> ASF.LICENSE.NOT.GRANTED--D849.3.patch, HBASE-5021-trunk.patch
>
>
> We have been getting hit with performance problems on our time-series
> database due to invalid timestamps being inserted by the timestamp. We are
> working on adding proper checks to app server, but production performance
> could be severely impacted with significant recovery time if something slips
> past. Since timestamps are considered a fundamental part of the HBase schema
> & multiple optimizations use timestamp information, we should allow the
> option to sanity check the upper bound on the server-side in HBase.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
