[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13459795#comment-13459795
 ] 

Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-6788 at 9/21/12 4:55 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

I'd be +1 with dropping CoprocessorProtocol from 0.96 and up, given all of the 
other (deliberate) incompatibilities posed with RPC going from 0.94 to 0.96 and 
up.

Edit: Removed accidental markup.
                
      was (Author: apurtell):
    I'd be +1 with dropping CoprocessorProtocol from 0.96+, given all of the 
other (deliberate) incompatibilities posed with RPC going from 0.94 to 0.96+.
                  
> Convert AuthenticationProtocol to protocol buffer service
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6788
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6788
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: coprocessors
>            Reporter: Gary Helmling
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> With coprocessor endpoints now exposed as protobuf defined services, we 
> should convert over all of our built-in endpoints to PB services.
> AccessControllerProtocol was converted as part of HBASE-5448, but the 
> authentication token provider still needs to be changed.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to