[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13460253#comment-13460253
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6852:
--------------------------------------
Interesting. Thanks Cheng. I wonder what causes the performance problem then.
Is it the get/putIfAbsent of the ConcurrentMap we store the metrics in?
I'd probably feel better if you set the threshold to 100 (instead of 2000) -
you'd still reduce the time used there by 99%.
Also looking at the places where updateOnCacheHit is called... We also
increment an AtomicLong (cacheHits), which is never read (WTF). We should
remove that counter while we're at it (even when AtomicLongs are not the
problem).
> SchemaMetrics.updateOnCacheHit costs too much while full scanning a table
> with all of its fields
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6852
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6852
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: metrics
> Affects Versions: 0.94.0
> Reporter: Cheng Hao
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 0.94.2, 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: onhitcache-trunk.patch
>
>
> The SchemaMetrics.updateOnCacheHit costs too much while I am doing the full
> table scanning.
> Here is the top 5 hotspots within regionserver while full scanning a table:
> (Sorry for the less-well-format)
> CPU: Intel Westmere microarchitecture, speed 2.262e+06 MHz (estimated)
> Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (Clock cycles when not halted) with a unit
> mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 5000000
> samples % image name symbol name
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 98447 13.4324 14033.jo void
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.metrics.SchemaMetrics.updateOnCacheHit(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BlockType$BlockCategory,
> boolean)
> 98447 100.000 14033.jo void
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.metrics.SchemaMetrics.updateOnCacheHit(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BlockType$BlockCategory,
> boolean) [self]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 45814 6.2510 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue$KeyComparator.compareRows(byte[], int, int,
> byte[], int, int)
> 45814 100.000 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue$KeyComparator.compareRows(byte[], int, int,
> byte[], int, int) [self]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 43523 5.9384 14033.jo boolean
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseek(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue)
> 43523 100.000 14033.jo boolean
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFileScanner.reseek(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue)
> [self]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 42548 5.8054 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue$KeyComparator.compare(byte[], int, int,
> byte[], int, int)
> 42548 100.000 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.KeyValue$KeyComparator.compare(byte[], int, int,
> byte[], int, int) [self]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 40572 5.5358 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlockIndex$BlockIndexReader.binarySearchNonRootIndex(byte[],
> int, int, java.nio.ByteBuffer, org.apache.hadoop.io.RawComparator)~1
> 40572 100.000 14033.jo int
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFileBlockIndex$BlockIndexReader.binarySearchNonRootIndex(byte[],
> int, int, java.nio.ByteBuffer, org.apache.hadoop.io.RawComparator)~1 [self]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
