[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13463466#comment-13463466
]
chunhui shen commented on HBASE-6870:
-------------------------------------
[~v.himanshu]
These two if statements is not made by this patch, so I just keep the previous.
{code}
public LinkedHashMap<byte[], HRegionLocation> getKeysToRegionsInRange(
{code}
Yes, it could be private.
Thanks for the review.
I will rework patch with other comments later
> HTable#coprocessorExec always scan the whole table
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6870
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6870
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Coprocessors
> Affects Versions: 0.94.1
> Reporter: chunhui shen
> Assignee: chunhui shen
> Attachments: HBASE-6870.patch, HBASE-6870-testPerformance.patch,
> HBASE-6870v2.patch, HBASE-6870v3.patch
>
>
> In current logic, HTable#coprocessorExec always scan the whole table, its
> efficiency is low and will affect the Regionserver carrying .META. under
> large coprocessorExec requests
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
