[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stack updated HBASE-4365:
-------------------------
Release Note:
Changes default splitting policy from ConstantSizeRegionSplitPolicy to
IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy. Splits quickly initially slowing as
the number of regions climbs.
Split size is the number of regions that are on this server that all are of the
same table, squared, times the region flush size OR the maximum region split
size, whichever is smaller. For example, if the flush size is 128M, then on
first flush we will split which will make two regions that will split when
their size is 2 * 2 * 128M = 512M. If one of these regions splits, then there
are three regions and now the split size is 3 * 3 * 128M = 1152M, and so on
until we reach the configured maximum filesize and then from there on out,
we'll use that.
Be warned, this new default could bring on lots of splits if you have many
tables on your cluster. Either go back to to the old split policy or up the
lower bound configuration.
This patch changes the default split size from 64M to 128M. It makes the
region eventual split size, hbase.hregion.max.filesize, 10G (It was 1G).
> Add a decent heuristic for region size
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-4365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4365
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.92.1, 0.94.0
> Reporter: Todd Lipcon
> Assignee: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: usability
> Fix For: 0.94.0
>
> Attachments: 4365.txt, 4365-v2.txt, 4365-v3.txt, 4365-v4.txt,
> 4365-v5.txt
>
>
> A few of us were brainstorming this morning about what the default region
> size should be. There were a few general points made:
> - in some ways it's better to be too-large than too-small, since you can
> always split a table further, but you can't merge regions currently
> - with HFile v2 and multithreaded compactions there are fewer reasons to
> avoid very-large regions (10GB+)
> - for small tables you may want a small region size just so you can
> distribute load better across a cluster
> - for big tables, multi-GB is probably best
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
