[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13489551#comment-13489551
 ] 

stack commented on HBASE-6389:
------------------------------

[~adityakishore] So, what happens on startup now (I don't recall how it worked 
way back in 0.92!).  We wait for how long for the minimum servers to check in?  
Once that period has elapsed, we start the assign to whoever has checked in?  
Thanks (I can take care of making a note in important configurations section, 
np).
                
> Modify the conditions to ensure that Master waits for sufficient number of 
> Region Servers before starting region assignments
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6389
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: master
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0, 0.96.0
>            Reporter: Aditya Kishore
>            Assignee: Aditya Kishore
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6389_0.94.patch, HBASE-6389_trunk.patch, 
> HBASE-6389_trunk.patch, HBASE-6389_trunk.patch, HBASE-6389_trunk_v2.patch, 
> HBASE-6389_trunk_v2.patch, org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestZooKeeper-output.txt, 
> testReplication.jstack
>
>
> Continuing from HBASE-6375.
> It seems I was mistaken in my assumption that changing the value of 
> "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" to a sufficient number (from 
> default of 1) can help prevent assignment of all regions to one (or a small 
> number of) region server(s).
> While this was the case in 0.90.x and 0.92.x, the behavior has changed in 
> 0.94.0 onwards to address HBASE-4993.
> From 0.94.0 onwards, Master will proceed immediately after the timeout has 
> lapsed, even if "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" has not 
> reached.
> Reading the current conditions of waitForRegionServers() clarifies it
> {code:title=ServerManager.java (trunk rev:1360470)}
> ....
> 581     /**
> 582      * Wait for the region servers to report in.
> 583      * We will wait until one of this condition is met:
> 584      *  - the master is stopped
> 585      *  - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.timeout' is reached
> 586      *  - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart' number of
> 587      *    region servers is reached
> 588      *  - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart' is reached 
> AND
> 589      *   there have been no new region server in for
> 590      *      'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.interval' time
> 591      *
> 592      * @throws InterruptedException
> 593      */
> 594     public void waitForRegionServers(MonitoredTask status)
> 595     throws InterruptedException {
> ....
> ....
> 612       while (
> 613         !this.master.isStopped() &&
> 614           slept < timeout &&
> 615           count < maxToStart &&
> 616           (lastCountChange+interval > now || count < minToStart)
> 617         ){
> ....
> {code}
> So with the current conditions, the wait will end as soon as timeout is 
> reached even lesser number of RS have checked-in with the Master and the 
> master will proceed with the region assignment among these RSes alone.
> As mentioned in 
> -[HBASE-4993|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4993?focusedCommentId=13237196#comment-13237196]-,
>  and I concur, this could have disastrous effect in large cluster especially 
> now that MSLAB is turned on.
> To enforce the required quorum as specified by 
> "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" irrespective of timeout, 
> these conditions need to be modified as following
> {code:title=ServerManager.java}
> ..
>   /**
>    * Wait for the region servers to report in.
>    * We will wait until one of this condition is met:
>    *  - the master is stopped
>    *  - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart' number of
>    *    region servers is reached
>    *  - the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart' is reached AND
>    *   there have been no new region server in for
>    *      'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.interval' time AND
>    *   the 'hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.timeout' is reached
>    *
>    * @throws InterruptedException
>    */
>   public void waitForRegionServers(MonitoredTask status)
> ..
> ..
>     int minToStart = this.master.getConfiguration().
>     getInt("hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart", 1);
>     int maxToStart = this.master.getConfiguration().
>     getInt("hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.maxtostart", 
> Integer.MAX_VALUE);
>     if (maxToStart < minToStart) {
>       maxToStart = minToStart;
>     }
> ..
> ..
>     while (
>       !this.master.isStopped() &&
>         count < maxToStart &&
>         (lastCountChange+interval > now || timeout > slept || count < 
> minToStart)
>       ){
> ..
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to