[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13491216#comment-13491216
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7009:
--------------------------------------
bq. Looking at the code I actually do not quite understand what masterChecked
is supposed to prevent against... Repeatedly checking the master if the master
is actually down?
Same here. From the comment, it seems to keep a BC behavior, but it is not
clear why we might not want to update from MasterAddressTracker.
bq. Let's give this until 0.94.4 to stabilize, unless you really want this in
0.94.3. I promise there will be a 0.94.4.
Agreed.
> Port HBaseCluster interface/tests to 0.94
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7009
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7009
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: test
> Affects Versions: 0.94.3
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Fix For: 0.94.4
>
> Attachments: HBASE-7009-p1.patch, HBASE-7009.patch,
> HBASE-7009-v2-squashed.patch
>
>
> Need to port. I am porting V5 patch from the original JIRA; I have a
> partially ported (V3) patch from Enis with protocol buffers being reverted to
> HRegionInterface/HMasterInterface
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
