[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13498376#comment-13498376
]
Jesse Yates commented on HBASE-6651:
------------------------------------
[~ikeda] this is looking pretty good. I added some comments on reviewboard
along with a couple questions as to the implementation. Sorry if I'm being
dense - this is tricky code and I'm a little late to this party :)
> Improve thread safety of HTablePool
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client
> Affects Versions: 0.94.1
> Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
> Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-6651.patch, HBASE-6651-V2.patch,
> HBASE-6651-V3.patch, HBASE-6651-V4.patch, HBASE-6651-V5.patch,
> HBASE-6651-V6.patch, sample.zip, sample.zip, sharedmap_for_hbaseclient.zip
>
>
> There are some operations in HTablePool accessing PoolMap in multiple places
> without any explicit synchronization.
> For example HTablePool.closeTablePool() calls PoolMap.values(), and calls
> PoolMap.remove(). If other threads add new instances to the pool in the
> middle of the calls, the newly added instances might be dropped.
> (HTablePool.closeTablePool() also has another problem that calling it by
> multiple threads causes accessing HTable by multiple threads.)
> Moreover, PoolMap is not thread safe for the same reason.
> For example PoolMap.put() calles ConcurrentMap.get() and calles
> ConcurrentMap.put(). If other threads add a new instance to the concurent map
> in the middle of the calls, the new instance might be dropped.
> And also implementations of Pool have the same problems.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
