[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13512016#comment-13512016
]
stack commented on HBASE-7271:
------------------------------
On commit, perhaps change thread name to have hosting servername prefix (see
other thread namings).
The check in the below should be under the synchronization block too...
+ if (regionsInProgress.contains(regRunnable.getRegionName())) {
+ synchronized (zkEventWorkerWaitingList){
+ zkEventWorkerWaitingList.put(regRunnable.getRegionName(),
regRunnable);
+ }
+ return;
+ }
Can do on commit.
+1 on commit.
> Have a single executor for all zkWorkers in the assignment manager
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7271
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7271
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: master, Region Assignment
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: nkeywal
> Assignee: nkeywal
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: 7271.v1.patch, 7271.v2.patch, 7271.v2.patch
>
>
> The current strategy is to have an array of monothreaded executor, and hash
> the zk path to ensure that there are no two events on the same region
> executed in parallel
> I think a single executor, as presented in the attached patch, is better
> because:
> - we're guaranteed to use all threads at any time
> - if managing one of the event takes longer that expected, the slowness is
> limited to this region, and not to all regions that have the same
> hashed/moduloed code
> - For the nodeChildrenChanged, there is no need to choose randomly one of the
> worker (or, once again, the risk to get stuck if one of the event takes time
> to be managed).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
