[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13533600#comment-13533600
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-6651:
--------------------------------------

See my post: 
http://hadoop-hbase.blogspot.com/2011/12/long-running-hbase-clients.html

It's only needed because the API is not designed right. Resources can't be 
controlled with it (max is per table). And - without your patch - it didn't 
even work correctly.
0.96 is the singularity where we can break stuff, if we do not do it now, we're 
stuck with it.

                
> Improve thread safety of HTablePool
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6651
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Client
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.1
>            Reporter: Hiroshi Ikeda
>            Assignee: Hiroshi Ikeda
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6651.patch, HBASE-6651-V10.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V2.patch, HBASE-6651-V3.patch, HBASE-6651-V4.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V5.patch, HBASE-6651-V6.patch, HBASE-6651-V7.patch, 
> HBASE-6651-V8.patch, HBASE-6651-V9.patch, sample.zip, sample.zip, 
> sharedmap_for_hbaseclient.zip
>
>
> There are some operations in HTablePool accessing PoolMap in multiple places 
> without any explicit synchronization. 
> For example HTablePool.closeTablePool() calls PoolMap.values(), and calls 
> PoolMap.remove(). If other threads add new instances to the pool in the 
> middle of the calls, the newly added instances might be dropped. 
> (HTablePool.closeTablePool() also has another problem that calling it by 
> multiple threads causes accessing HTable by multiple threads.)
> Moreover, PoolMap is not thread safe for the same reason.
> For example PoolMap.put() calles ConcurrentMap.get() and calles 
> ConcurrentMap.put(). If other threads add a new instance to the concurent map 
> in the middle of the calls, the new instance might be dropped.
> And also implementations of Pool have the same problems.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to