[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13545586#comment-13545586
]
Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7503:
-------------------------------
Consider adding the new test to TestFromClientSide3.java - TestFromClientSide
is getting quite big.
{code}
+ LOG.warn("exists(List<Get>) is really list of get() calls, just use
get()");
{code}
Did you intend to put the above in javadoc ?
{code}
+ * @return Array of true if the specified Get matches one or more keys,
false if not
{code}
'Array of' -> 'Array of Boolean'
{code}
+ } catch (InterruptedException e) {
+ LOG.warn("Failed for get:" + gets.get(i).toString(), e);
{code}
Restore interrupt status.
Currently we have GetRequest in Client.proto. I wonder whether it is worth
introducing MultiGetReuqest where we have:
{code}
repeated Get get = 2;
{code}
This way we can group Gets by region and make fewer calls to server.
> Add exists(List) in HTableInterface to allow multiple parallel exists at one
> time
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7503
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7503
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Assignee: Jean-Marc Spaggiari
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-7503-v0-trunk.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 5m
> Remaining Estimate: 5m
>
> We need to have a Boolean[] exists(List<Get> gets) throws IOException method
> implemented in HTableInterface.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
