[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13550868#comment-13550868
]
Elliott Clark commented on HBASE-7533:
--------------------------------------
My thought was that the union type would have an optional exception type in
addition to the response types; that would allow us to more directly tie
exceptions from multis to the action that caused them. Though that might not
be great. What do others think ?
> Write an RPC Specification for 0.96
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7533
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7533
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: stack
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> RPC format is changing for 0.96 to accomodate our protobufing all around.
> Here is a first cut. Please shred:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-1RJMLXzYldmHgKP7M7ynK6euRpucD03fZ603DlZfGI/edit
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
