[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13560238#comment-13560238
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6466:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12566046/6466-v6.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:red}-1 findbugs{color}. The patch appears to introduce 3 new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestLocalHBaseCluster
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4135//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Enable multi-thread for memstore flush
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6466
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6466
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: chunhui shen
> Assignee: chunhui shen
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: 6466-v6.patch, HBASE-6466.patch, HBASE-6466v2.patch,
> HBASE-6466v3.1.patch, HBASE-6466v3.patch, HBASE-6466-v4.patch,
> HBASE-6466-v4.patch, HBASE-6466-v5.patch
>
>
> If the KV is large or Hlog is closed with high-pressure putting, we found
> memstore is often above the high water mark and block the putting.
> So should we enable multi-thread for Memstore Flush?
> Some performance test data for reference,
> 1.test environment ：
> random writting；upper memstore limit 5.6GB;lower memstore limit 4.8GB;400
> regions per regionserver；row len=50 bytes, value len=1024 bytes;5
> regionserver, 300 ipc handler per regionserver;5 client, 50 thread handler
> per client for writing
> 2.test results:
> one cacheFlush handler, tps: 7.8k/s per regionserver, Flush:10.1MB/s per
> regionserver, appears many aboveGlobalMemstoreLimit blocking
> two cacheFlush handlers, tps: 10.7k/s per regionserver, Flush:12.46MB/s per
> regionserver,
> 200 thread handler per client & two cacheFlush handlers, tps:16.1k/s per
> regionserver, Flush:18.6MB/s per regionserver
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
