[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13567735#comment-13567735
]
nkeywal commented on HBASE-7590:
--------------------------------
Actually, one of the issue is that in the client code, we don't really manage
the server name. We use the hostname & the port, but we don't use directly the
start code... There is sequence number, but I need to find out if it matches
the start code.
Despite this, I have something working for the server side, and the client
receives the status. The point is to put properly the checks in the client (and
this is unrelated to the communication protocol :-)
> Add a costless notifications mechanism from master to regionservers & clients
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7590
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7590
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Client, master, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0
> Reporter: nkeywal
> Assignee: nkeywal
>
> t would be very useful to add a mechanism to distribute some information to
> the clients and regionservers. Especially It would be useful to know globally
> (regionservers + clients apps) that some regionservers are dead. This would
> allow:
> - to lower the load on the system, without clients using staled information
> and going on dead machines
> - to make the recovery faster from a client point of view. It's common to use
> large timeouts on the client side, so the client may need a lot of time
> before declaring a region server dead and trying another one. If the client
> receives the information separatly about a region server states, it can take
> the right decision, and continue/stop to wait accordingly.
> We can also send more information, for example instructions like 'slow down'
> to instruct the client to increase the retries delay and so on.
> Technically, the master could send this information. To lower the load on
> the system, we should:
> - have a multicast communication (i.e. the master does not have to connect to
> all servers by tcp), with once packet every 10 seconds or so.
> - receivers should not depend on this: if the information is available great.
> If not, it should not break anything.
> - it should be optional.
> So at the end we would have a thread in the master sending a protobuf message
> about the dead servers on a multicast socket. If the socket is not
> configured, it does not do anything. On the client side, when we receive an
> information that a node is dead, we refresh the cache about it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
