[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13574800#comment-13574800
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-6469:
----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12568619/HBASE-6469.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.constraint.TestConstraint
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/4385//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Failure on enable/disable table will cause table state in zk to be left as
> enabling/disabling until master is restart
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6469
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.94.2, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Nick Dimiduk
> Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.6
>
> Attachments: 6469-expose-force-r3.patch, HBASE-6469.patch
>
>
> In Enable/DisableTableHandler code, if something goes wrong in handling, the
> table state in zk is left as ENABLING / DISABLING. After that we cannot force
> any more action from the API or CLI, and the only recovery path is restarting
> the master.
> {code}
> if (done) {
> // Flip the table to enabled.
> this.assignmentManager.getZKTable().setEnabledTable(
> this.tableNameStr);
> LOG.info("Table '" + this.tableNameStr
> + "' was successfully enabled. Status: done=" + done);
> } else {
> LOG.warn("Table '" + this.tableNameStr
> + "' wasn't successfully enabled. Status: done=" + done);
> }
> {code}
> Here, if done is false, the table state is not changed. There is also no way
> to set skipTableStateCheck from cli / api.
> We have run into this issue a couple of times before.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
