[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575064#comment-13575064
 ] 

Ted Yu commented on HBASE-7797:
-------------------------------

I understand what this JIRA proposes.
I was thinking how we can migrate to o.a.hbase in one shot.
Currently we have:

trunk tyu$ find . -name '*.java' | wc
    1521    1521  133734

By the time we prepare 1.0 or 2.0, there would be ~2000 files. We should think 
about the following questions:
1. who would migrate ~2000 files in matter of day - more than one. We can 
partition the work among volunteers.
2. how long trunk should be frozen so that this renaming can be completed 
without many rebasings

If we have clear plan, I am fine with reverting to single namespace for now.
                
> Use consistent package name
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-7797
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7797
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>            Assignee: Enis Soztutar
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.96.0
>
>
> This has been discussed here: http://search-hadoop.com/m/bXxiV1MGsYi2. 
> We should not release 0.96 with two namespaces. This will cause further pain 
> and confusion in the future (like log4j configuration, greping logs, etc). 
> As much as I like it, I don't see us going o.a.hbase namespace, so let's move 
> the Cell, and prefix tree classes to o.a.hadoop.hbase. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to