[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13577837#comment-13577837
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7834:
--------------------------------------
bq. Missing hadoop 0.23. Probably should be listed as NT for 0.92, 0.94, and we
can decide on X or NT for 0.96.
Thanks for the reminder. Will update with 0.23. Yahoo is the main consumer of
23, and AFAIK, they should be running a released version. [~toffer] care to
chime in. I would be ok with X, X, NT respectively.
bq. You think we should drop the punt to vendors section altogether and just
hold to apache versions.
Yes.
bq. Cloudera bundles 0.92 but I want to run 0.94 on CDH4 – will it work?... and
our answer will be NT always?
If those issues come up in mailing list, etc, I don't see any problem of
explaining the testing done, or redirecting them to vendor specific mailing
lists / forums. My main concern is that, explaining the intricacies of base
versions of vendor products which include Hadoop is out of scope. Maybe we can
add a link to Powered-By pages of Hadoop and HBase.
> Document Hadoop version support matrix in the book
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7834
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7834
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Enis Soztutar
> Assignee: Enis Soztutar
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-book-hadoop.txt
>
>
> Lets do a support matrix in the book for HBase versions x Hadoop versions,
> and some cleanup in the Hadoop section.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
