[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13581011#comment-13581011
]
Liang Xie commented on HBASE-7495:
----------------------------------
[~zjusch], yeh, good idea, i can't agree more.
but to be honest,i'd like to do per-table or other granularity configue in
another jira, to make parallel-seeking feature more configurable. it's just
boring to rebase again(if conflicts with new patches) for me:)
is it suitable to merge Ted's last rebased v12 patch into trunk now ?
Thanks very much:)
> parallel seek in StoreScanner
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7495
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scanners
> Affects Versions: 0.94.3, 0.96.0
> Reporter: Liang Xie
> Assignee: Liang Xie
> Attachments: 7495-v12.txt, HBASE-7495-0.94.txt, HBASE-7495.txt,
> HBASE-7495.txt, HBASE-7495.txt, HBASE-7495-v10.txt, HBASE-7495-v11.txt,
> HBASE-7495-v2.txt, HBASE-7495-v3.txt, HBASE-7495-v4.txt, HBASE-7495-v4.txt,
> HBASE-7495-v5.txt, HBASE-7495-v6.txt, HBASE-7495-v7.txt, HBASE-7495-v8.txt,
> HBASE-7495-v9.txt
>
>
> seems there's a potential improvable space before doing scanner.next:
> {code:title=StoreScanner.java|borderStyle=solid}
> if (explicitColumnQuery && lazySeekEnabledGlobally) {
> for (KeyValueScanner scanner : scanners) {
> scanner.requestSeek(matcher.getStartKey(), false, true);
> }
> } else {
> for (KeyValueScanner scanner : scanners) {
> scanner.seek(matcher.getStartKey());
> }
> }
> {code}
> we can do scanner.requestSeek or scanner.seek in parallel, instead of current
> serialization, to reduce latency for special case.
> Any ideas on it ? I'll have a try if the comments/suggestions are positive：）
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
