[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13592966#comment-13592966
]
Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-6222:
---------------------------------------
bq. If that's accurate, would adding caching and indirection layers above
KeyValue possibly compromise the fundamental design goal
I'm inclined to agree. Certainly it complicates it. Shouldn't be in an initial
drop for the sake of establishing correctness first.
> Add per-KeyValue Security
> -------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-6222
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6222
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 0.96.0, 0.98.0
> Reporter: stack
> Assignee: Andrew Purtell
> Attachments: 6222-aclcf.patch, 6222.pdf,
> cell-acls-kv-tags-not-for-review.zip,
> HBaseCellRow-LevelSecurityDesignDoc.docx, HBaseCellRow-LevelSecurityPRD.docx
>
>
> Saw an interesting article:
> http://www.fiercegovernmentit.com/story/sasc-accumulo-language-pro-open-source-say-proponents/2012-06-14
> "The Senate Armed Services Committee version of the fiscal 2013 national
> defense authorization act (S. 3254) would require DoD agencies to foreswear
> the Accumulo NoSQL database after Sept. 30, 2013, unless the DoD CIO
> certifies that there exists either no viable commercial open source database
> with security features comparable to [Accumulo] (such as the HBase or
> Cassandra databases)..."
> Not sure what a 'commercial open source database' is, and I'm not sure whats
> going on in the article, but tra-la-la'ing, if we had per-KeyValue 'security'
> like Accumulo's, we might put ourselves in the running for federal
> contributions?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
