[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13595588#comment-13595588
]
Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-7999:
--------------------------------------
bq. I'd argue that we should still reserve a system namespace
Indeed. We should have smt like "system" as a reserved ns, and all tables in it
by default would be system tables. We wouldn't need a different list command
for example, since list tables in namespace would be applicable.
> Add 'system' tables
> -------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-7999
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7999
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Client, master, Protobufs
> Reporter: Jesse Yates
> Assignee: Jesse Yates
> Fix For: 0.96.0
>
> Attachments: hbase-7999-v0.patch, hbase-7999-v2.patch
>
>
> System tables are necessary as we start moving towards other internally
> scoped uses for tables (already we have a similar paradigm with the ACL table
> in the security stuff). This allows things like an statistics table, a
> secondary index table, moving replication queues out of ZK - just to name a
> couple of things that have come up.
> The first use-case would be HBASE-7958 where we would want to support a
> system level statistics table.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
