[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13605847#comment-13605847
 ] 

Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-8119:
--------------------------------------

Quoting review at https://reviews.apache.org/r/9998/: 
Attaching a patch for improving the running time of StochasticLoadBalancer 200x 
times. 

TestStochasticLoadBalancer#testMidCluster() Current impl:
//2013-03-15 17:28:25,495 DEBUG [main] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(256): 
Finished computing new laod balance plan.  Computation took 172526ms to try 
15000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 600 regions; Going 
from a computed cost of 35.85000000000001 to a new cost of 23.481578947368426
With patch:
//2013-03-18 14:56:13,541 DEBUG [Thread-2] 
balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(436): Finished computing new laod balance plan. 
 Computation took 941ms to try 15000 different iterations.  Found a solution 
that moves 600 regions; Going from a computed cost of 35.85 to a new cost of 
23.48157894736842

The improvements come from: 
 - Optimized array based data structures in Cluster class
 - Getting rid of hashmaps 
 - Optimized region move and swap ops 
 - Removing most of the computation to cluster initialization, and state change 
for the cluster, thus eliminating computing the same results over and over
 - Some profiling

There should be further optimizations but this should be a good start. If we 
ran into more problems, we can investigate further. There are a lof of TODO's 
added in this patch. I'll create a jira for collecting some thoughts, but I 
wont have the time to work on those for now. 

There are (hopefully) minor semantic changes in the algo. I had to bump up 
loadMultiplier, and decrease moveCostMultiplier. See comments at 
TestStochasticLoadBalancer#testLargeCluster(). Please review carefully. 

As noted in testLargeCluster(), this does not work for large clusters > 100000 
regions, 1000 nodes. This can be solved by smt like 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_annealing instead of random walk with 
eager selection. 
                
> Optimize StochasticLoadBalancer
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8119
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Region Assignment
>    Affects Versions: 0.95.0
>            Reporter: Enis Soztutar
>             Fix For: 0.95.0
>
>
> On a 5 node trunk cluster, I ran into a weird problem with 
> StochasticLoadBalancer:
> server1       Thu Mar 14 03:42:50 UTC 2013    0.0     33
> server2       Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013    0.0     34
> server3       Thu Mar 14 03:46:53 UTC 2013    465.0   42
> server4       Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013    11455.0         282
> server5       Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013    0.0     34
> Total:5               11920   425
> Notice that server4 has 282 regions, while the others have much less. Plus 
> for one table with 260 regions has been super imbalanced:
> {code}
> Regions by Region Server
> Region Server Region Count
> http://server3:60030/         10
> http://server4:60030/         250
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to