[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-6647:
-------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 0.95.0)
                   0.94.2

Fix up after bulk move overwrote some 0.94.2 fix versions w/ 0.95.0 (Noticed by 
Lars Hofhansl)
                
> [performance regression] appendNoSync/HBASE-4528 doesn't take deferred log 
> flush into account
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-6647
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6647
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.0
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.94.2
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-6647-0.94.patch, HBASE-6647-0.94-v2.patch, 
> HBASE-6647-0.94-v3.patch, HBASE-6647.pach
>
>
> Since we upgraded to 0.94.1 from 0.92 I saw that our ICVs are about twice as 
> slow as they were. jstack'ing I saw that most of the time we are waiting on 
> sync()... but those tables have deferred log flush turned on so they 
> shouldn't even be calling it.
> HTD.isDeferredLogFlush is currently only called in the append() methods which 
> are pretty much not in use anymore.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to