[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13624731#comment-13624731
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8286:
----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12577427/8286.txt
  against trunk revision .

    {color:red}-1 @author{color}.  The patch appears to contain 2 @author tags 
which the Hadoop community has agreed to not allow in code contributions.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 12 new 
or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces lines longer than 
100

  {color:green}+1 site{color}.  The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.lock.TestZKInterProcessReadWriteLock

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5167//console

This message is automatically generated.
                
> Move site back up out of hbase-assembly; bad idea
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8286
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8286
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: stack
>            Assignee: stack
>         Attachments: 8286.txt
>
>
> Redoing the packaging, I thought it smart putting it all under the new 
> hbase-assembly module.  A few weeks later, it is not looking like a good idea 
> (Enis suggested moving the site was maybe 'odd').  Here are a few issues:
> + The generated reports will have mention of hbase-assembly because that is 
> where they are being generated (Elliott pointed out the the scm links mention 
> hbase-assembly instead of trunk).
> + Doug Meil wants to build and deploy the site but currently deploy is a bit 
> awkward to explain because site presumes it is top level so staging goes to 
> the wrong place and you have to come along and do fixup afterward; it 
> shouldn't be so hard.
> A possible downside is that we will break Nicks site check added to hadoopqa 
> because site is an aggregating build plugin... but lets see.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to