[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13628717#comment-13628717 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8119: ---------------------------------- {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12578136/hbase-8119_v2.patch against trunk revision . {color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified tests. {color:red}-1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch failed to compile against the hadoop 2.0 profile. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/5257//console This message is automatically generated. > Optimize StochasticLoadBalancer > ------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-8119 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8119 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Region Assignment > Affects Versions: 0.95.0 > Reporter: Enis Soztutar > Assignee: Enis Soztutar > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.95.1 > > Attachments: hbase-8119_v2.patch > > > On a 5 node trunk cluster, I ran into a weird problem with > StochasticLoadBalancer: > server1 Thu Mar 14 03:42:50 UTC 2013 0.0 33 > server2 Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013 0.0 34 > server3 Thu Mar 14 03:46:53 UTC 2013 465.0 42 > server4 Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013 11455.0 282 > server5 Thu Mar 14 03:47:53 UTC 2013 0.0 34 > Total:5 11920 425 > Notice that server4 has 282 regions, while the others have much less. Plus > for one table with 260 regions has been super imbalanced: > {code} > Regions by Region Server > Region Server Region Count > http://server3:60030/ 10 > http://server4:60030/ 250 > {code} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira