[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13642091#comment-13642091
 ] 

Nicolas Spiegelberg commented on HBASE-8423:
--------------------------------------------

See: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1475883

Note that I would definitely consider this an advanced feature and exploratory. 
 I jury-rigged a way to track Major Compacted file metrics versus non-mc files 
to get the stats for this theory.  I suggest that only people who know how to 
look at HBase metrics use this feature.  Not a lot of code, but definitely 
diligent analysis necessary.  Also, note that I use the Dynamic Schema Config 
from HBASE-5335 to change this on a per-CF basis.
                
> Allow Major Compaction to Use Different Compression
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-8423
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8423
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Nicolas Spiegelberg
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: compaction, regionserver
>
> For the Messages use case, ~90% of the disk util is associated with major 
> compacted files but less than 33% of the get IOPS are due to mc files.  
> Allowing a different compaction algorithm for major compacted files will 
> allow us to get ~30% disk savings.  Latency should be higher, but storefile 
> querying is sequential, so only 1/3 of the get latency is from disk access to 
> these files.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to